Flash Player Plug-In Required
Multiple Asset Protection Layers Often Don’t Work

By Lee R. Phillips

The hot shot speakers and the hot shot lawyers go through elaborate plans where one trust owns the corporation or LLC and then that company owns another trust. One of the favorite structures is for a corporation to be the general partner of a limited partnership, thus making it so you’re not personally liable as the general partner.  I have seen many structures where a corporation is the owner of all of the person’s LLCs.

All of this is done to get multiple layers of asset protection.  If they get through one “corporate shield”, then the other ones will maybe hold.  These schemes add a lot of cost to your asset protection plan.  The lawyer gets his fee for each entity that is established.  There are state fees for many of the entities (basically everything but trusts).  I have seen these types of structures collapse under their own weight.  Remember, a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. (more…)

Q & A February 2010, Creditor Liens, Living Trusts, Protect your Home, LLCs

By Lee R. Phillips

Today I will answer additional inquiries from people who are researching better ways to handle asset protection and estate planning matters. I hope everyone can learn from the things others are facing, and see options to explore with your own trusted advisors.

Q. My parents and I just purchased a condo as joint tenants. We are each 1/3 owners in the property and all 3 of our names are on the real estate deed. The property is my permanent residence only. If the property is put into my father’s living trust (I am a secondary trustee, after my parents and the primary beneficiary) can a creditor place a lien or force the sale of this property (while in the trust) if the possible future judgment is only against myself (an individual)?? Thanks!! Brian W.

A. In my book, Guaranteed Millionaire I have a line that reads “Kids are like yogurt, you never know when they are going to go bad.”  The line is intended to make the reader laugh, but it drives home the point that the more names that are on your deed the greater the likelihood that the property will be subject to a creditor.  The answer is “Yes, when anyone of you listed on the deed has a creditor, that creditor can force the sale of the property. If you take your name off the deed and make the sole “owner” your parent’s trust, then the property would not be subject to future creditors you may have.  However, at that point it is not your house any more.  It is your parent’s piece of property.  If they let you live there for free, the IRS will impute a reasonable rent to their income.  Additionally, you can’t take advantage of the tax advantages home ownership gives you.  They can’t take advantage of those either, because it is not their personal residence.  The house will still be subject to their creditors, even though it is in the trust.  The trust doesn’t protect property from creditors.  It prevents probate.  The house will be included in your parents’ estate for estate tax calculations.  You have lost total control over the house.  (Actually, you have no control now, because your parents have to approve a sale or whatever.)  If you are taking your name off the deed to avoid current creditors, they can undo the transaction, because it is a fraudulent conveyance.  Why are your parents on your deed as joint tenants in the first place?  If you need them to get a loan, they should simply guarantee the loan and not go on the deed. (more…)